Daily Claude Code sessions, 1 engineer
Claude Sonnet 4.6One engineer running claude-code interactively most of an 8-hour day. Mostly Sonnet 4.6 with occasional Opus 4.8 escalation for hard refactors. Heavy prompt caching keeps reads cheap.
Direct (list price)
$162
upstream provider / mo
Anvat metered (30% off)
$113
pay-as-you-go / mo
Anvat + 2× credit match
$56.7
effective burn rate / mo
Annual savings vs direct — $1,264 (65% lower)
Note — Assumes 60-70% cache hit rate on common system prompts. Real-world spend will be 30-50% lower than the blended number once cache reads are weighted in.
Claude Code across a 10-engineer team
Claude Sonnet 4.610 engineers, daily Claude Code sessions, weekday-only. Same usage shape as the single-engineer case scaled 10×.
Output / mo
60M tok
@ $15/M
Direct (list price)
$1,620
upstream provider / mo
Anvat metered (30% off)
$1,134
pay-as-you-go / mo
Anvat + 2× credit match
$567
effective burn rate / mo
Annual savings vs direct — $12,636 (65% lower)
Note — Caching effects amplify at team scale because the same project context is shared across many sessions.
Autonomous PR code-review agent
Claude Opus 4.8Agent picks up every PR opened in a 50-engineer org, reviews diffs end-to-end against repo conventions. Opus 4.8 for the actual review pass, Haiku 4.5 for triage.
Output / mo
18M tok
@ $75/M
Direct (list price)
$2,550
upstream provider / mo
Anvat metered (30% off)
$1,785
pay-as-you-go / mo
Anvat + 2× credit match
$893
effective burn rate / mo
Annual savings vs direct — $19,890 (65% lower)